3:2 vs 6:5 Blackjack: Which one is better?

The Basics of Blackjack and its Ratios

When it comes to playing Blackjack, there are two ways to approach it. The first is known as 3:2, while the second is 6:5. These may just look like numbers to the untrained eye, but the one you choose could impact your impression of the game.

Essentially, these numbers refer to how much you would receive if you hit a natural blackjack. You could think about it as a ratio. When playing 3:2, you will have the chance to win 1.5x your bet; when playing with 6:5, you’ll be looking at closer to 1.2x. As you can imagine, the higher payout of the 3:2 format makes it a popular choice, with the 6:5 version often being seen as favouring the house over the player. However, it’s not quite that simple, so let’s jump in and get to the bottom of which ratio is actually better.


The Basics of Blackjack Payouts

The reason there is even a debate about this relates to one key part of the game of Blackjack: the natural blackjack. The role these ratios play in the game really comes into effect once the additional payout associated with being dealt an Ace and a 10-value card happens. The reason you would select one ratio over the other comes down to your strategy and ability to think ahead to this moment.

The 3:2 Payout

Traditionally, the 3:2 payout ratio has been the way to go. If you’ve played Blackjack before, you probably played with the 3:2 ratio. As mentioned earlier, hitting a natural blackjack with this ratio will give you a 1.5x prize on your total bet amount. Let’s say you bet $50 and then hit a natural blackjack. This would give you $75 on top of your $50 bet for a total win of $125.

Advantages for Players

It’s not just that you can win more money when playing with the 3:2 ratio; it can also affect the game in other ways. This has to do with creating better odds for the player over time and lowering the house edge. If you were instead playing with payout ratios that hold lower multiples, such as 6:5, the house would hold the potential advantage in the long run.

What does this really mean for the game itself? Should we even be thinking about this, or should we just accept both forms of the game for what they each bring to the blackjack table?

The 6:5 Payout

If the 3:2 ratio has so much going for it, why is the 6:5 version gaining such popularity? What could people possibly see in a format of the game that lowers their ability to win big prizes? Does this defy logic?

The answer to this potentially comes down to the style in which players—particularly those within the Blackjack community—approach the game. With smaller wins, players and some casinos are developing a more conservative version of the game that leads to a more challenging experience. By only gaining 1.2x your bet after a natural blackjack, you could be more inclined to hold back and think differently.

Criticisms and Concerns

It’s no secret that the 6:5 version of Blackjack has its critics. The spirit of the game could be seen to be diminished by the more conservative approach the 6:5 format promotes. Where is the ferocity that comes when players are able to win 1.5x their total bet amount? Also, players have noted concerns that the casinos are preferring the 6:5 version of the game due to the way it causes a higher house edge.

Key Differences Between 3:2 and 6:5 Payouts

To put it simply, these two versions of the game lead to two different levels of payout. The 3:2 ratio gives you a 1.5x prize for a natural blackjack, while the 6:5 reduces this amount to 1.2x. Once you start playing with large sums of money, the version you choose can have a significant impact on how much you can win as well as the style in which you approach the game itself.

With less ability to win big after hitting a natural jackpot, would you still look to play the game the same way? Is it still worth taking risks, or would it be smarter to sit back and wait for the perfect opportunity? Let’s take a closer look at how the 3:2 vs 6:5 debate is changing the way people play Blackjack all over the world.

Impact on Player Strategy

It all comes down to strategy. If everybody at the table is preserving their bankroll, do you think this will lead to an engaging game of Blackjack? Some might say yes, but others would likely disagree. This is the question at the centre of this debate.

Even if you were to accept the difference in payout potential, the difference in playing style would still be apparent depending which version of the game you select. The 6:5 ratio has been said to lead to a slower and more conservative strategy. Whether this is a good or bad method is up to you. Is it possible that the game is evolving in this way for a reason, and is it being driven by the house rather than the players?

House Edge Analysis

Before we take a look at how the house edge is affected by the two versions of the game, let’s take a look at what a “house edge” actually is. Essentially, this is referring to a statistical advantage that a casino can obtain over a long period of time. The long and short of it is that the house edge will be higher when playing in a 6:5 format and lower when offering the original 3:2 version. If this means that players are more likely to lose money over time when playing 6:5, this will likely be noticed and capitalized on by the house.

Strategies for 3:2 vs 6:5

It’s clear that game strategy will be impacted depending on whether you’re playing with a 3:2 format or 6:5. Because 3:2 offers more incentive to land a natural blackjack, your strategy will undoubtedly lean toward the aggressive side of the spectrum. However, with that incentive being lessened in the 6:5 variety, your overall strategy will follow suit and tilt toward being more conservative and preserving your bankroll.

The Debate Continues

It’s likely the debate about 3:2 and 6:5 ratios will continue long into the future. Essentially, it comes down to player experience. Most people who play Blackjack will prefer to use the original format of 3:2 because it can lead to higher payouts. However, this is not a golden rule. Some people do prefer to play with the 6:5 ratio despite the fact that it can lead to a higher house edge. The blackjack table is a good place for discussion, so perhaps you can use some of what you learned today the next time you sit down and play with your friends or at a casino?

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 3 to 2 in Blackjack?

“3 to 2” is essentially another way of talking about the win ratio of 3:2. When it comes to Blackjack, this is when you hit a natural blackjack and are rewarded at a rate of 3:2. For example, if you bet $50 and hit a natural blackjack, you would receive $75 plus your bet for a total prize of $125. The only reason this is even a topic is due to the emergence of the 6:5 ratio that has taken hold in casinos and in parts of the blackjack community. This is where, instead of playing for 1.5x your total bet amount within the 3:2 format, you will be looking at closer to 1.2x your total bet amount. This leads to lower payouts once you hit a natural blackjack and is creating a new, more conservative playing style.

What is the House Edge in 6:5 Blackjack?

A house edge is any statistical advantage a casino could hold over players during a long stretch of time. When it comes to Blackjack, playing the 6:5 ratio will potentially give the house a higher house edge than the 3:2 format.

When Did 6:5 Blackjack Start?

It’s not easy to put an exact date on the beginning of 6:5 Blackjack. Some might point to the early 2000s as the genesis of the 6:5 format, but this is only a guess. Whenever it began, it has gone on to become a hot topic in the Blackjack community and will potentially continue to be one for years to come.

Learn more about blackjack in our blog articles: