Flat betting is one of the simplest ways to approach staking, built on consistency rather than adjustment.
This method has been used for decades and continues to feature in many forms of wagering.
This guide covers everything from clearing up what flat betting really means to showing how you can put it into practice with structure and control.
Flat betting is a staking method built on a fixed wager amount. The same stake is placed on each bet for a defined period, usually set between one month and a year. The amount is calculated as a percentage of the bankroll, most often falling between 1% and 5%. A stake in the 2–3% range is often considered a balanced middle ground that combines caution with steady play.
Unlike progressive systems that change the stake after each result, flat betting keeps every wager the same size. This consistency makes bankroll movement steadier and tracking results more straightforward.
At the end of each period, often referred to as a control point, the stake can be recalculated. If the bankroll has grown, the same percentage is applied to the new total, allowing the unit size to scale while the underlying principle stays the same.
Flat betting is often misunderstood, with some assuming it carries qualities that no staking method can truly deliver. While it is a clear and disciplined way of approaching wagers, it should not be seen as a foolproof approach.
One of the most common misconceptions is that flat betting somehow ensures victory over time. This is not the case. The method does not alter the probabilities of what you are wagering on. Wins and losses still depend entirely on the outcomes themselves. What flat betting does is regulate how much you risk, keeping losses contained and predictable.
Flat betting is not a guaranteed formula for long-term profit. While it can help protect a bankroll and smooth out variance, it cannot overcome the built-in advantage that sportsbooks hold.
Any potential winnings that come from flat betting are a product of the bets placed (and chance), not the staking method itself. Once again, the approach focuses on maintaining control rather than producing profit.
Flat betting does not provide direction on which markets or selections to choose. The method functions solely as a money management approach rather than a system for predicting outcomes.
The responsibility for making informed choices still lies with you, whether that comes from research, analysis, statistical modelling, or other methods. Flat betting simply ensures that every wager is made with the same level of financial commitment.
Flat betting comes with strengths that highlight its clarity and structure, as well as drawbacks that reveal its limitations. Understanding both sides provides a balanced view of what the method can realistically offer.
One of the main advantages of flat betting is its straightforward nature. There are no complicated calculations, and once the stake size is set, it stays the same throughout a control period, making the process easy to follow. This simplicity can also be a drawback, as it leaves little flexibility to adjust stakes based on changing odds.
Flat betting encourages steady behaviour, reducing the temptation to chase losses or overextend after wins. Because the stake stays the same, results are easier to track and performance becomes clearer over time. That same consistency can also feel restrictive to those who prefer adjusting bet sizes to perceived opportunities.
By limiting every wager to the same stake, flat betting helps prevent rapid bankroll depletion. Losses are spread evenly, keeping exposure predictable and under control. The system emphasizes protection and longevity over aggressive growth.
Getting started with flat betting involves a few simple steps that help you apply the method with structure and discipline. By setting clear rules for yourself from the beginning, you can avoid common mistakes.
The first step is determining how much money you are comfortable setting aside for betting.
This bankroll should be kept separate from everyday finances and treated as spare money. Knowing your total bankroll gives you the foundation for consistent stake values.
Once the bankroll is set, the next step is to decide how much to risk on each wager. As noted earlier, flat betting usually places stakes between 1% and 5% of the bankroll, with 2-3% often used as a balanced range.
For example, a $500 bankroll would translate to $10-$15 per wager. Because the stake stays the same, the amount at risk is predictable each time, with recalculations only made at longer intervals if the bankroll changes.
As established, flat betting doesn’t dictate what you wager on, so this step comes down to your own research and decision-making. Whether it’s a match or a tournament, the important part is that you stick to your unit size once you’ve made your choice.
Since flat betting is built on keeping the same stake for every wager, the key here is simply to stick with the amount you’ve chosen. Following through on that rule prevents the urge to chase losses or press harder after wins, keeping the approach steady.
Although flat betting manages your money, it doesn’t guarantee results. Doing your homework by studying form, identifying value odds, considering injuries, and avoiding purely emotional picks can improve your decision-making.
Keeping records of your wagers is an overlooked but valuable step. By noting what you’ve staked, the odds, the outcome, and when the bet was placed, you can see your overall approach and whether you need to stop.
Flat betting brings structure, but that doesn’t mean errors disappear. Many of the pitfalls stem from behaviour rather than the method itself. Recognizing these mistakes helps maintain this approach.
Even with a fixed stake, the temptation to recover quickly can creep in. Increasing your wager to make up for past results undermines the very idea of flat betting.
Once you abandon the system in pursuit of recovery, the protection it offers against rapid bankroll depletion disappears. A losing streak may then become far more damaging than it needs to be, undoing the discipline that flat betting is designed to provide.
Placing wagers without thought or research defeats the purpose of measured staking. Since flat betting doesn’t guide what you choose to wager on, rushing into selections can quickly erode your bankroll.
Flat betting may control the size of each wager, but it doesn’t limit how often you place them. Overextending by betting on too many events in a short span of time exposes you to unnecessary risk, even when each stake is modest.
As covered earlier, the method does not determine what you bet on, only how much. Overlooking analysis, form, injuries, or odds value leaves the system less effective. The stake may be under control, but poor selections will still hurt results.
Neglecting to keep records, even with a simple system like flat betting, is a common yet avoidable mistake. Without tracking, it becomes harder to identify patterns and measure performance, making it difficult to adjust your approach. The simplicity of flat betting works best when paired with accurate records.
Flat betting already encourages discipline, but you can strengthen that control further by adding safeguards. These extra measures make the system more resilient and help ensure that betting stays within healthy boundaries.
Establishing limits in advance is one of the most effective ways to maintain control. This can mean setting a maximum stake per day, a cap on the number of wagers placed, or a ceiling on total weekly spend. Limits create extra structure by preventing excessive volume or prolonged sessions that may chip away at your bankroll.
At LeoVegas, you can access LeoSafePlay to encourage responsible gaming. Deposit caps, time-outs, loss limits, and reality checks can all complement a flat betting strategy. By activating these features, you reinforce the principle of consistency and ensure that betting activity doesn’t move beyond what you originally planned.
Another simple but effective measure is to step away at set intervals. Even with a structured staking plan, long sessions can lead to clouded judgment. Scheduling breaks gives you time to reset and review your results with a clear mind, helping you avoid impulsive decisions that could undermine the discipline flat betting is meant to provide.
Emotions can still shape decisions, even when the staking method is kept constant. Frustration after a losing run or overconfidence following a win can push you toward choices that don’t align with your plan. Actively monitoring how you feel before and after placing a bet helps you recognize these triggers.
Flat betting is often described as a single method, but in practice, there are several variations that differ in how the stake is calculated. Below are some of the most common approaches:
This is the most popular type of flat betting. Stakes are set between 1% and 3% of the bankroll, with the percentage moving within that range based on several factors.
This type of flat betting is considered the safest. The stake is usually fixed at about 1% of the bankroll and does not change over time. This steady approach provides maximum stability and makes it unlikely for a single result to cause serious damage to the bankroll.
As the name suggests, this version abandons structure. Wagers may reach 10% or more of the bankroll and change freely from one bet to the next. Without limits to keep stakes consistent, the chance of rapid and heavy losses increases sharply.
This type involves much higher risk. Stakes are set at around 5% of the bankroll and are typically concentrated on a single market or competition. Because of the larger unit size, the potential swings are sharper. Unlike chaotic flat, aggressive flat still follows a clear rule for stake sizing. It is generally approached with caution, as consecutive losses can have a significant impact.
Flat betting stands apart from progressive systems, which adjust stake size based on previous outcomes. The contrast highlights the stability of flat betting compared with the higher volatility that progression systems create.
Progressive betting usually involves increasing stakes after a loss to chase recovery or raising them after a win to press an advantage. The most well-known example is the Martingale system, where the stake doubles after each loss until a win occurs.
While this approach may seem appealing in the short term, the risk is that a long losing streak quickly escalates the required stake, leading to significant losses or hitting table limits.
Flat betting avoids the extremes of progression systems by keeping each stake the same, no matter the outcome. Even though recovery from losses is slower, the benefit is that risk stays controlled and predictable. Progression amplifies volatility, while flat betting trades speed for steadiness and long-term stability.